Saturday, December 28, 2019

How Many Presidents Were Republican

There have been 19 Republican presidents in the United States since the party was founded in March 1854, and the first Republican to win the presidency was Abraham Lincoln in 1861. Even though the Democratic Party has been around longer than the Republican party, there have only been 13 Democrat presidents. Here are the first 18 Republican presidents in order of their terms, along with a few highlights of each presidents time in office. Republican Presidents of the 19th Century WIN-Initiative  / Getty Images Abraham Lincoln, 16th U.S. President from 1861–1865: Considered by many to be the greatest of U.S. presidents, Lincoln led the country through its only civil war, ultimately preserving the union of the United States of America. His Emancipation Proclamation declared that slaves in rebel states were forever free; this did not free slaves but rather changed the face of the conflict to include the fight for human freedom.Ulysses S. Grant, 18th, 1869–1877: Grant was the commander of the Union forces during the Civil War and won the presidency in 1869 and 1873. Grants presidency oversaw the Reconstruction of the South following the Civil War and the passage of the 15th Amendment, which ensured the right to vote to citizens of all races.Rutherford B. Hayes, 19th, 1877–1893: Hayes one-term presidency is most often associated with the end of Reconstruction. In fact, many believe that his agreement to pull federal troops out of the South (effectively ending Reconstruction ) led to his victory for the presidency.James A. Garfield, 20th, 1881: Garfield died in office from a gunshot wound only four months into his term. His investigation of the Star Route Scandal, which implicated members of his own party, led to several important civil service reforms.Chester A. Arthur, 21st, 1881–1885: Arthur was vice president under James Garfield and stepped in as president after Garfields death. He had a history of fighting for anti-slavery cases as a New York lawyer. As president, he is remembered for the Pendleton Civil Service Act, which mandated that government jobs be awarded on merit, not political connections.Benjamin Harrison, 23rd, 1889–1893: The grandson of the 9th U.S. President William Henry Harrison, Benjamin Harrison had one term in office. His administration is  noted for civil service reform and anti-trust initiatives. On the lighter side of things, the White House was fitted for electrical service under Harrison, who didnt trust ele ctric lights enough to use them.William McKinley, 25th, 1897–1901: McKinleys presidency was noted for the Spanish-American War and the annexation of Hawaii. He won reelection in 1880 but was assassinated shortly into his second term, adding the cases of Tecumsehs curse. Republican Presidents of the 20th Century Theodore Roosevelt, 26th, 1901–1909: The Trust Buster is considered one of Americas greatest presidents. He was charismatic and larger than life. He was  also the youngest of all the presidents, entering office at age 42. In  contrast to later Republican presidents, Roosevelt fought hard to limit the powers of large oil and railroad companies.William H. Taft, 27th, 1909–1913: Taft may be best known for supporting Dollar Diplomacy, the idea that US foreign policy should provide stability with the ultimate goal of promoting American commercial ventures. He was the only president who served as a justice of the Supreme Court (and chief justice at that).Warren G. Harding, 29th, 1921–1923: Harding served just one day shy of three years, dying of a heart attack while in office. His presidency saw the end of World War I but was marked by scandals involving bribery, fraud, and conspiracy. Harding and Coolidge. Topical Press Agency  / Getty Images   Calvin Coolidge, 30th, 1923–1929: Coolidge was vice president under Warren Harding and succeeded to the presidency after Hardings death. His administration is noted for the Immigration Act, cuts of taxes imposed during World War I, and opposition to Congress farm relief bill on the belief that the government should not be involved in setting market prices.Herbert Hoover, 31st, 1929–1933: The stock market crashed just seven months into Hoovers presidency, leaving him in charge during the worst years of the Great Depression. He won 444 electoral votes to become president, but four years later lost his bid for reelection  by a wide margin.Dwight Eisenhower, 34th, 1953–1961: A military hero, Eisenhower was the commander in charge of the D-Day invasion and subsequently became a five-star general. He was a staunch anti-communist who supported the expansion of nuclear arms following World War II. Major civil rights advancements occurred during his presidency, as well as the creation of the interstate highway system and NASA.Richard M. Nixon, 37th, 1969–1974: Nixon is most famous for, of course, the Watergate scandal, which led to his resignation during his second term as president. His administration saw Neil Armstrong walk on the moon, the creation of the Environmental Protection Agency, and the ratification of the 26th Amendment, giving 18-year-olds the right to vote.Gerald Ford, 38th, 1974–1977: Ford holds the unique distinction of being the only president who never won an election for president or vice president. He was appointed vice president by Nixon after Spiro Agnew resigned that post. Later, he stepped in as president after Nixon resigned.Ronald Reagan, 40th, 1981–1989: Reagan was  the oldest president to serve (until Donald Trump) but is remembered for many more distinctions, including ending the Cold War, appointing the first woman to the Supreme Court, surviving an assassination attempt,  and the Iran-Contra scandal.George H.W. Bush, 41st, 1989–1993: Perhaps remembered as an unremarkable president, the senior Bush presided over some undeniably remarkable events, including the invasion of Panama and deposing of Manuel Noriega, the Savings and Loan Bailout, the aftermath of the Exxon Valdez oil spill, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the breakup of the Soviet Union, and the Persian Gulf War. Republican Presidents of the 21st Century George W. Bush, 43rd, 2001–2009: Bushs election in 2000 remains clouded by controversy, but he may  be remembered most for his reactions to the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, not least of which include two wars, in Afghanistan and Iraq.Donald J. Trump, 45th, elected 2016: The current U.S. President was a businessman and television personality before being elected, and his legacy remains to be seen.

Friday, December 20, 2019

The Relationship Between Boy And Girl And Young People Who...

The family, whatever their constitution, as the first and most important group of belonging of human beings, within which interact with the first people who make up our microsystem, where everyone comes into contact with a variety of expressions and values that shape our subjectivity, ideally primary function to take care of all its members, ensure their underage persons full enjoyment and development of their mental and intellectual faculties, guide them with affection of a natural state of dependency and immaturity, one of progressive independence, social and emotional maturity. It is expected that from the first interactions, the boy or girl can build self-knowledge, learn their own value, gain their emotional security, their emotional†¦show more content†¦The wealth of a child s microsystem as a risk or prevention factor for the occurrence of situations of child abuse will therefore depend both on the life history of the adults responsible for their care and their particular convictions in As to patterns of relationship and education, the characteristics of other people with whom me. MESOSYSTEM, (relationships that are established between the different immediate surroundings of the subject, for example the relationship between family and school): Grandmother, the main interaction with the teacher was on her part. The interaction between neighbors and my grandmother. The mesosystems would be given by those connections existing between the different areas to get through my daily life. The Bronfenbrenner model maintains that mesosystems are basic for development, in this respect I can point out that for the time we mentioned, I clearly remember how my grandmother interacted with my neighbors from relationships of hypocrisy and gossip and with my teachers from the relationship of friends And older ladies. EXOSISTEMA, (organization of theShow MoreRelatedEssay about The Impact of Divorce on Children1401 Words   |  6 Pagesaffects numerous people around the world. Divorce can be a heartbreaking process that affects not just the couple but their children also. I am going to be comparing the impact of divorce on children in context to Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory. Individual The individual in this context is the child that is affected by the divorce of their parents. Studies show that divorce can affect a child’s social skills (Kim, 2011). Research shows that gender is a factor and that girls tend to be moreRead MorePsychosocial Development and the Effects of Teenage Pregnancy3953 Words   |  16 PagesPsychosocial Development and the Effects of Teenage Pregnancy Liberty University Abstract An estimated 400,000 teen girls, ages 15-19 years, give birth each year in the US. In today’s media sexual activity and teen parenting is often glamorize, but the truth of the matter is the reality is harshly different. Having a child during the teen’s formative years carries the high price of emotional, physical, and financial, not only to the mother, but father, child, and community. Parents, educatorsRead MoreHuman Development2424 Words   |  10 Pagesrole of the family. Different cultures and societies have different ideas about the nature of a family. Some cultures value a nuclear family, while others are more accepting of families which are extended, (Papalia Olds, 1998). The decisions adults make about a child’s growing independence will also vary. In some cultures, decisions are made based upon age or gender, where for some the child’s ability will be the most important factor (Berk, 2003). Bronfrenbrenners Ecological Systems Theory is veryRead MoreSummary Of The Breakfast Club1660 Words   |  7 Pagesclassic film depicting the scene of five high school students who spend their Saturday in detention together. The stereotypical popular girl is played by a character named Claire and she somewhat associates with the admired wrestler, Andrew. Brian is the character that embodies an intellectual personality, while Allison is portrayed as the misfit. Lastly, there is John also referred to as â€Å"Bender†, a character who symbolizes the â€Å"reckless bad boy† that every high school seems to have. At the beginningRead Morecompare Bronfenbrenner and Erikson Essay3116 Words   |  13 Pagesimplications in the world of adult education, particularly from the perspective of experience within two South Kerry Adult Education Centres and finally the areas where these theories may concur and contrast. Erik Erikson was a Neo-Freudian Psychologist who developed a lifespan theory identifying eight stages of psychosocial human development. As Erikson and his wife, Joan, entered their eightieth decade, they discovered a ninth stage. Joan Erikson completed work on this stage from notes made by herRead MoreEnrique s Ecological Analysis And Analysis1721 Words   |  7 PagesEnrique’s Ecological Analysis Shanell Bathersfield Our Lady of the Lake University Enrique’s Ecological Analysis Poverty can be defined as the condition where people basic need for shelter, food, and clothing are not being met. Whereas Jensen (2009 ) define poverty as a chronic and debilitating condition that results from multiple adverse synergistic risk factors and affect the mind, body and soul. Jensen (2009) has identified six types of poverty. The six types of poverty are situational, generationalRead MoreEssay about Todays Adolescents: A Look at Sexual Development4190 Words   |  17 Pagesthe young adolescent body. During puberty the body undergoes many physical changes that seemingly just appear. For girls in the early years of adolescence may not see any secondary changes in their appearance however their ovaries began to grow. In recent years girls have been experiencing puberty at early periods rather than 8-11 years old. Because of evidence linking early maturation to adjustment and body image problems we should not consider early maturation to be an advantage for girls (JaffeRea d MoreHouse of Lannister Essay6353 Words   |  26 Pagesgrows biologically, but it may also means how a person grows mentally. Development may also mean how a person matures as an individual, living and assimilating in into the various aspects of society. Psychosocial theory attempts to understand how people develop by studying all three of these dimensions of human development. That is to say, the psychosocial approach looks at the biological, psychological and social components that affect how individuals generally develop throughout the course of theirRead MoreA Project on Apple Inc.12777 Words   |  52 Pagesbankers, was on the verge of going under the hammer, the launch of a small gadget turned the corners for Apple Inc. Today Apple Inc. is known by the world as the company which gave it the iPod, followed by the iPhone. Both these gadgets have been lapped up by millions of music lovers and mobile users around the word. Little do these youngsters know that manufacturing iPods and iPhones is not the main business of Apple Inc. It is computers. In 1984, Apple was the first to launch a computer with a revolutionaryRead MoreManaging Information Technology (7th Edition)239873 Words   |  960 PagesI-7 Midsouth Chamber of Commerce (B): Cleaning Up an Information Systems Debacle CASE STUDY II-1 Vendor-Managed Inventory at NIBCO CASE STUDY II-2 Real-Time Business Intelligence at Continental Airlines CASE STUDY II-3 Norfolk Southern Railway: The Business Intelligence Journey CASE STUDY II-4 Mining Data to Increase State Tax Revenues in California CASE STUDY II-5 The Cliptomaniaâ„ ¢ Web Store: An E-Tailing Start-up Survival Story CASE STUDY II-6 Rock Island Chocolate

Thursday, December 12, 2019

Theory of Motivation free essay sample

Theory of Motivation As the cliche goes, no man is an island. Everything man does is influenced by other men and his environment. Be it in school or at work, the reason why people persevere lies on the desire to achieve a certain goal. Hence, motivation is essential to keep the drive of doing things passionately and effectively. However, the enthusiasm to sustain the dream and keep the motivation alive can be tampered by life’s uncertainties. Given the unique characteristics that each student possess, the amount of effort exerted by an average student does not always equal the amount of effort exerted by an outlier in class, yet the results are the same or sometimes exceeded by the outlier. Perhaps there are instances when studying overnight and not studying at all yielded the same result. These situations affect the level of motivation a student harness when studying. The feeling of unfairness affects how he/she will prepare for the next exam. In the workplace setting, motivation is likewise an important factor to increase productivity. For example, an employee who worked overtime to get the job well done vis-a-vis an employee who slacked off and produced a mediocre output both received the same salary and the same praises from their boss. The hardworking employee might feel wronged upon seeing how his extra effort was overlooked. To give justice to the unfairness he feels, he opts to mimic the other employee, thus also producing a mediocre output. The equity theory of motivation, developed by workplace and behavioral psychologist John Stacey Adams in 1963, is grounded on the concept that employees tend to seek equity or balance in the amount of input they give to their job or relationship with their bosses, and the output they receive. The inputs referred in this theory include college degree, hard work, effort, committment, ability, adaptability, determination, flexibility, skill, loyalty, tolerance, enthusiasm, trust in superiors, support from colleages, personal sacrifice and the like. On the other hand, outputs come in the form of financial benefits like salary, bonuses, and perks, and also intangible benefits such as recognition from superiors, praises, responsibility, job security, good reputation, sense of achievement, personal growth and the like. When an employees inputs outweigh his or her outputs, he or she becomes demotivated and unhappy. To achieve equity, the behavioral response is to balance out the input-output equation by asking for an increase in the output side, or  simply diminishing his or her input. The state of equity lie on the perception of an employee in relation to another employees input and output ratio, which shows that employee motivation is subjective nature. However, an employer or managers role of keeping employees motivated should not be deterred by this notion. Instead, understanding the sources of employee dissatisfaction and demotivation can help managers address the issues surrounding the workplace to allow for a more productive and work-conducive environment. The equity theory is more commonly known as the social comparison theory or the inequity theory since an employee compares his input-output ratio with another employees input-output ratio to determine equity, and an employee who feels inequity or unfairness reduces this through his behavior and attitude towards work. The â€Å"exchange relationship† between work and compensation in comparison with a colleage draws forth discernment of what is fair and unfair. To grasp the intuition behind the theory, four objects must be present which include the person, whose aim is to reduce whatever inequity feeling he or she has; the comparison to other, which pertains to the benchmark person from whom equity and inequity is determined; the inputs and the outputs. According to the theory, a person first compares inputs and outputs with a comparison other, then determines if there is inequity or unequal input/output ratio between himself/herself and comparison other. Basically, the theory assumes that an individual addresses his/her inequity feeling after comparison to others, and remains at the level where equity is achieved. Several ways a person does in reaching equity include altering his/her inputs, altering his/her outputs, distorting his inputs and outputs cognitively, finding a new job, or changing the person of comparison. (Gogia, 2010) In line with this, Huseman, Hattfield and Miles (1987) dissected the equity theory into four basic ideas. First, the notion of fairness is conceived through comparing an individual’s input and outcomes ratio with others. The other does not necessarily require a colleage, because it can also be his/her old self. Comparing the amount of effort exerted and the amount of salary received to a colleage’s or an old job facilitates the judgment of what is fair to an individual. Second, if the compared ratios are not equal, then there is inequity. The two kinds of inequity are underpayment inequity and overpayment inequity. Underpayment inequity happens when an individual deems that his/her ratio is smaller than others, or in other words, his great effort mismatches with the benefit received as compared to another employee. On the contrary, overpayment inequity occurs when a big compensation is received from the little effort exerted, as compared to other coworkers. Third, the greater the difference in inequity, the greater tension and distress the individual feels. The different attitudes people have toward life’s unfairness in general brought about the three kinds of equity-sensitive people namely the benevolents, the equity sensitives and the entitleds, with the benevolents being the most tolerant of underrewards, and the entitleds having the most preference of over-rewards. The equity sensitives just want their ratio to be the same with others, but the entitleds believe that the world owes them, so it is just rightful for them to receive more. Forth, the more intense feeling of tension brought about by inequity, the harder an individual will work to restore equity. This is just like how a more oppressed victim is more thirsty he is to seek justice, if not revenge. The ways in achieving equity varies from person to person. Upon experiencing the feeling of unfairness, the assumption of this theory is that employees will find ways to reduce inequity. The two most typical ways are through behavioral options and cognitive options, where the latter is used more often used since it is both less riskier and easier to do than the former. For behavioral options, the employees change their input to match outcomes like slacking off or leaving work early, changing outcomes to match input by asking for an increase, or perpetrating a crime like theft or fraud, persuading others to change inputs by complaining to superiors, and withdrawal through tardiness, absenteeism or quitting the job. As for the cognitive options, the employee distorts his own inputs or outcomes by underestimating his own performance so that the inputs will match the output; distort the inputs or outcomes of others by thinking that others earn more because they probably deserve it; change the comparison others by choosing a different benchmark for them to feel better. (â€Å"Motivation theories†, 2009) Applying this theory in the government office place gives a clearer understanding as to why in general, government employeees are unmotivated and unhappy with their jobs. Perhaps they have once tried to work dilligently, but only end up with having the same across-the-board incentive as fellow workers who do not work as hard as them. Hence, the Aquino administration came up with the performance-based incentive system to allow a fair compensation to those who deserve to be rewarded. By altering the outcome through a performance-based bonus, government employees try to match their performance to the amount of bonus they wish to receive. Motivation Theories. (2009, April 26). Retrieved from http://www. authorstream. com/Presentation/nsraja_hhh-180607-motivation-theories-education-ppt-powerpoint/. Adams Equity Theory (n. d. ). Retrieved from http://www. mindtools. com/pages/article/newLDR_96. htm. Gogia, P. (2010, September 14). Equity theory of motivation. Retrieved from http://www. businessihub. com/equity-theory-of-motivation/. https://wikispaces. psu. edu/display/PSYCH484/5. +Equity+Theory RRL 4. Why Do Employees Take More Initiatives to Improve Their Performance After Co-developing Performance Measures? A Field Study (Groen, Wouters Wilderom, 2012) Usually, people work more conscientiously when their performances are being monitored, be it in school, at work, or even in playing games. Knowing how grades, scores or output are obtained help an individual’s goal setting and invoke the determination and commitment to achieve the said goal. What more if the employees themselves determine how they are to be rated? Having an opinion and first hand experience in developing performance measure criteria make employees not only feel valued, but also feel a sense of fairness because they know that the criteria they set are attainable and reasonable. Groen, Wouters and Wilderom (2012) conducted a field study to investigate why employees perform better when they are involved in developing peformance measures. The study used the theory of planned behavior, which states that beliefs predict how individuals behave or plan to behave. Gathering data from meetings, interviews, company information data, quantitative questionnaire and first-hand experience in the field in a beverage manufacturing company, bottling line employees were found to be more motivated, have more initiative, and more positively affected by social pressure when they were involved in developing performance measures. The variables examined in the study included attitude towards the job, social pressure from coworkers, capability from personal skills. All these variables were found to positively and significantly influence an employee’s intiative towards his job, thus increasing his productivity. The study showed that productivity and initative of the employees who were aware and had a say on performance measurement criteria improved the departments’ overall performance. 7. Models of Performance-Measurement Use in Local Governments: Understanding Budgeting, Communication, and Lasting Effects (Melkers Willoghby, 2005) Since performance measurement has been emphasized in various literatures, the importance of having them adopted and implemented is no longer debatable. Performance measurement schemes help in understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the organization, and it also serves as an objective basis of planning the budget to be used to fund government projects. The study of Melkers and Willoghby (2005) paid close attention to the usefulness of performance-based information on the operations of the local government in the US, communication, and budgetary decisions. The pervasiveness of performance measurement implementation in the US was also studied through the results obtained from a national survey of city and county administrators and budgeters of nearly 300 governments. Multiple regression analysis was implemented to find out whether dependent variables budget effects, communication effects and lasting effects index were individually affected by independent variables community characteristics, respondent characteristics, organizational culturea and performance measurement characteristics. The results showed that although the use of performance indicators was pervasive, the respondents were apathetic with regards to the effectiveness of these performance measurements for budgetary concerns and operational processes within the government unit. Promoting the Utilization of Performance Measures in Public Organizations: An Empirical Study of Factors Affecting Adoption and Implementation (Julnes Holzner, 2001) It is true that performance measurements are vital for making informed decisions. Both public and private firms need to be guided on a set of parameters that help them determine where they have done well and what areas need improvement. If the government departments are serious  in improving their service to the public, then coming up with a set of criteria and implementing these evaluation criteria would be essential in determining where to start the change. Despite recognizing the importance of having performance measures, there are several issues that impede the development and usage of a performance measurement scheme. The empirical study by Julnes and Holzner (2001) examined the factors that hamper the utilization of performance measurement in public organizations in the US. A sample of state and local government employees were drawn from the Government Financial Officers Association, International City/County Management Association of College and University Business Officers obtained from GASB. A total of 934 questionnaires were sent to state and local government employees across the nation in 1997. The variables used in the survey included adoption and implementation for the dependent variable, and external requirements, internal requirements, internal interest groups, external interest groups, attitudes, risk taking, information, resources, goal orientation, percent unionized, government type and position. Using ordinary least square mulitple-regression analyses, the results of the study revealed that output measures were developed for various programs, but efficiency measures and outcome measures were less developed. Looking at the performance measure usage, the researchers found out that efficiency and outcome measures were less used for strategic planning, resource allocation, program management, monitoring and evaluation, reporting to internal management, electec officials, citizens or media. Aside from these, the researchers’ findings showed that internal requirements, external requirements, goal orientation and access to information positively and significantly affect the adoption of performance measures, while external interest groups and internal requirements positively affect implementation of performance measures, but unionization negatively affect implementation. Overall, the policy of using performance measures would more likely be adopted if it were an internal requirement wherein top management commits to the effort of evaluating government programs. On the contrary, external requirement would not automatically merit the implementation of performance measures since factors such as organizations’ ability, politician’s support, sufficient resources and commitment to the purpose were lacking if not missing. The study suggests that public administrators be aware that performance measure is a two-step process namely adoption and implementation, wherein factors affecting adoption include mostly rational and technocratic theory, while actual implementation are determined by political and cultural factors. The Use of Performance Measurement Systems in the Public Sector: Effects on Performance (Spekle Verbeeten, 2013) Performance measurement information are collected and used in various ways such as strategic planning, budgeting, and employee bonus planning. The immense benefits of measuring performance outweighs the costs of collecting such data, which is why most government agencies have already instilled in their system a peformance measurement mechanism for reference. In the study of Spekle and Verbeeten (2013), the researchers explored whether the pefromance measurement system actually improves or deters organizational performance. They also introduced the concept of contractibility, which means clear goals, undistorted pefromance metrics, managers’ knowledge and control of the transformation process. Public sector organizations that have high contractibility were expected to be better than those organizations with low contractibilty in terms of performance. The test was done through a survey of 101 public sector organizations in the US. The results showed that contractibility influences the way incentive-oriented use of the performance measurement system and performance. More interestingly, the researchers concluded that usign the performance measurement system for incentive purposes negatively influences organizational performance, unless contractibility is high. Disregarding contractibility, performance measurement system tends to enhance performance.